de
en
Schliessen
Detailsuche
Bibliotheken
Projekt
Impressum
Datenschutz
zum Inhalt
Detailsuche
Schnellsuche:
OK
Ergebnisliste
Titel
Titel
Inhalt
Inhalt
Seite
Seite
Im Dokument suchen
Özisik, Sakin: Intergenerational changes in the religiosity of Turkish Islamic immigrants in contemporary Germany: a qualitative analysis using the faith development [...]. 2016
Inhalt
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
Bielefeld, 23 September 2015
Diss_Özisik(2015-03-11-komm-hs-2015-04-12)
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PART ONE
2.1. Family, Socialization and Religious Education of Turkish Islamic Immigrants in Germany
2.1.1. The Migration of Turkish Families
2.1.2. Turks as Muslims in German Society
2.1.3. Socialization and Religious Education of Turkish Muslims
2.1.4. Family and Education from the Islamic Perspective
2.1.5. Islamic-Turkish Organizations
2.1.6. Conclusion
2.2. The Religiosity of Turkish People in Turkey and in Germany: Some Findings in Field Studies
2.2.1. Religiosity in Turkey
2.2.2. The Religiosity of Turkish Immigrants in Germany
2.2.2.1. Fundamentalism among Turkish Muslim Youth in Germany
2.2.2.2. Individuation and Changes in Religious Style
2.2.2.3. Muslim Religiosity in the Typologies of Biographical Studies in Germany
2.2.2.4. Family and the Religiosity of Generations
3. PART TWO
3.1. Conceptual Considerations and Hypothetical Model: Faith in the Islamic Tradition
3.1.1. Faith (Îman): an Etymological and Conceptual Clarification
3.1.2. The Concept of Îman and its Relation with “Islam”
3.1.3. The problem of Development in the Islamic Faith
3.2. Faith Development Models
3.2.1. Faith Development Theory of James W. Fowler
3.2.2. Fowler’s Definition of “Faith”
3.2.3. Definition of Faith Development
3.2.4. Religious Styles Perspective of H. Streib and Faith Development
3.3. Conclusion: Evaluation of Field studies on Muslims in Germany from the Perspective of Faith Development
3.4. Research Questions
3.5. Methodological Perspective
3.5.1. Research Instrument
3.5.2. The Sample
3.5.3. Process of Data Collection
3.5.4. Transcription of the Interviews and the Evaluation Process
4. PART THREE
4.1. Case Studies and the Results
4.1.1. Demir Family Case Study Over Three Generations
4.1.1.1. Mr. Demir 1
4.1.1.1.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.1.1.2. Reconstruction of his Relations with (non-)Significant Others
4.1.1.1.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.1.1.4. Image of God
4.1.1.1.5. Religiosity
4.1.1.1.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.1.1.7. Summary
4.1.1.2. Mr. Demir 2
4.1.1.2.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.1.2.2. Reconstruction of Relations with Significant Others
4.1.1.2.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.1.2.4. Image of God
4.1.1.2.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.1.2.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.1.2.7. Summary
4.1.1.3. Mr. Demir 3
4.1.1.3.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.1.3.2. Reconstruction of Relations with Others
4.1.1.3.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.1.3.4. Image of God
4.1.1.3.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.1.3.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.1.3.7. Summary
4.1.2. Comparison in Faith Development
4.1.3. Case Study of Three Generations of the Akay Family
4.1.3.1. Mrs. Akay 1
4.1.3.1.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.3.1.2. Reconstruction of Relations with Significant Others
4.1.3.1.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.3.1.4. Image of God
4.1.3.1.5. Understanding of Religiosity and the Practice of Religion
4.1.3.1.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.3.1.7. Summary
4.1.3.2. Mrs. Akay 2
4.1.3.2.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.3.2.2. Relations with Significant Others
4.1.3.2.3. Current Image of Parents
4.1.3.2.4. Social Relations and Friendships
4.1.3.2.5. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.3.2.6. Image of God
4.1.3.2.7. The Meaning of Religiosity
4.1.3.2.8. Moral Justifications and Authorities
4.1.3.2.9. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.3.2.10. Summary
4.1.3.3. Mrs. Akay 3
4.1.3.3.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.3.3.2. Relations with Significant Others
4.1.3.3.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.3.3.4. Image of God
4.1.3.3.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.3.3.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.3.3.7. Summary
4.1.4. Summary and Comparison in Faith Development
4.1.5. Case Study of Three Generations of the Özkan Family
4.1.5.1. Mr. Özkan 1
4.1.5.1.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.5.1.2. Reconstruction of Relations with Significant Others
4.1.5.1.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.5.1.4. Image of God
4.1.5.1.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.5.1.6. Form of Belief in Supernatural Themes
4.1.5.1.7. Summary
4.1.5.2. Mrs. Özkan 2
4.1.5.2.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.5.2.2. Relations with Significant Others and Exploring Muslim Female Identity
4.1.5.2.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.5.2.4. Image of God
4.1.5.2.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.5.2.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.5.2.7. Summary
4.1.5.3. Ms. Özkan 3
4.1.5.3.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.5.3.2. Reconstruction of Relations with (Significant) Others
4.1.5.3.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.5.3.4. Image of God
4.1.5.3.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.5.3.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.5.3.7. Summary
4.1.6. Case Study of Three Generations of the Yıldız Family
4.1.6.1. Mr. Yıldız 1
4.1.6.1.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.6.1.2. Relations with Others
4.1.6.1.3. Appropriation of Religion and Image of God
4.1.6.1.4. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.6.1.5. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.6.1.6. Summary
4.1.6.2. Mr. Yıldız 2
4.1.6.2.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.6.2.2. Reconstruction of Relations
4.1.6.2.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.6.2.4. Image of God
4.1.6.2.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.6.2.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.6.2.7. Summary
4.1.6.3. Mr. Yıldız 3
4.1.6.3.1. Biographic Reconstruction
4.1.6.3.2. Reconstruction of Relations
4.1.6.3.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.6.3.4. Image of God
4.1.6.3.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.6.3.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.6.3.7. Summary
4.1.7. Case Studies Three Generations of Polat Family
4.1.7.1. Mr. Polat 1
4.1.7.1.1. Biographical Reconstruction
4.1.7.1.2. Relations and the Image of Parents
4.1.7.1.3. Image of God
4.1.7.1.4. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.7.1.5. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.7.1.6. Summary
4.1.7.2. Mr. Polat 2
4.1.7.2.1. Biographical Self-Reflection
4.1.7.2.2. Relations with Significant Others
4.1.7.2.3. Image of God
4.1.7.2.4. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.7.2.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.7.2.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.7.2.7. Summary
4.1.7.3. Mr. Polat 3
4.1.7.3.1. Biographical Self-Reflection
4.1.7.3.2. Reconstruction of Relations with Others
4.1.7.3.3. Appropriation of Religion
4.1.7.3.4. Image of God
4.1.7.3.5. Understanding of Religiosity
4.1.7.3.6. Form of Belief in Metaphysical Themes
4.1.7.3.7. Summary
5. Development of Faith and Religiosity in the Process of Generations
5.1. Life Worlds and Life Stories in Generational Comparison
5.2. First Generation
5.3. Second Generation
5.4. Second-Generation Women
5.5. Intergenerational Relations and the Second Generation
5.6. Third Generation
5.7. Religion in the Generational Dynamic
5.7.1. Reflection on the Image of God
5.7.2. The Problem of Theodicy and the Image of God
5.7.3. Appropriation of the Perception of God in the Three-Generation Process
5.7.4. Religiosity
5.7.5. Understanding of Metaphysical Themes across Generations
6. Conclusion
BIBLIOGRAPHY