Inhalt

•  
   Abstract
•  
   Publications
•  
   Acknowledgments
•  
   Contents
•  
  List of figures
•  
   List of figures
•  
  List of tables
•  
   List of tables
•  
  List of hypotheses
•  
   List of hypotheses
•  
  1 Introduction
•  
   1.1 Thesis Motivation
•  
   1.2 Research Questions
•  
   1.3 Hypotheses
•  
   1.4 Scenario & System
•  
   1.5 Demarcation to other works
•  
   1.6 Contributions
•  
   1.7 Outline
•  
  2 Socially Assistive Robots
•  
   2.1 Socially Assistive Robotics for Exercising
•  
   2.1.1 Summary
•  
   2.1.2 Open Issues
•  
  2.2 Psychological Background
•  
   2.2.1 Social Cognitive Theory
•  
   2.2.2 Self-Determination Theory
•  
   2.2.3 Flow
•  
   2.2.4 Group Dynamics
•  
   2.2.5 Summary
•  
  3 Effects of a Robot's Embodiment and Social Role
•  
   3.1 Introduction
•  
   3.2 Related Work on Embodiment and Social Role
•  
   3.2.1 Embodiment of SAR
•  
   3.2.2 Social Role
•  
   3.2.3 Research Questions and Hypotheses
•  
   3.3 Study Design
•  
   3.3.1 Video Material and Script
•  
   3.3.2 Conditions
•  
   3.3.3 Measures
•  
   3.3.4 Participants
•  
   3.3.5 Statistics Used in This Thesis
•  
   3.4 Results
•  
   3.5 Discussion
•  
   3.6 Conclusion
•  
  4 Motivational Effects of Exercising With Robot Partners
•  
   4.1 Introduction
•  
  4.2 Related Work and Hypotheses
•  
   4.2.1 Köhler Effect with Virtual Agents
•  
   4.2.2 Köhler Effect with Robot
•  
   4.2.3 Hypotheses
•  
   4.3 Study and System Design
•  
   4.3.1 Experimental Design and Participants
•  
   4.3.2 Conditions
•  
   4.3.3 System Design
•  
   4.3.4 Study Procedure
•  
   4.3.5 Measures
•  
  4.4 Results
•  
   4.4.1 Manipulation Check
•  
   4.4.2 Persistence
•  
   4.4.3 Perception of Partner
•  
   4.4.4 Perceived Exertion
•  
   4.4.5 Future Assistance
•  
   4.4.6 Social Role
•  
   4.4.7 Further results
•  
   4.4.8 Free Responses
•  
   4.5 Discussion
•  
   4.6 Conclusion
•  
  5 Motivational Effects of Feedback from Robots
•  
   5.1 Introduction
•  
   5.2 Related Work on Feedback from SAR
•  
  5.3 Study Design
•  
   5.3.1 Experimental Design and Participants
•  
   5.3.2 Conditions
•  
   5.3.3 Measures
•  
   5.4 Results
•  
   5.4.1 Manipulation Check
•  
   5.4.2 Persistence
•  
   5.4.3 Perception of the Partner
•  
   5.4.4 Additional Results
•  
   5.4.5 Free Responses
•  
   5.5 Discussion
•  
   5.6 Conclusion
•  
  6 Motivational Effects of Embodiment
•  
   6.1 Introduction
•  
   6.2 Related Work on Embodied Socially Assistive Robots
•  
   6.3 Planned Data Analysis
•  
  6.3.1 Conditions and Experimental Design
•  
   6.3.1.1 Conditions
•  
  6.4 Results
•  
   6.4.1 Persistence
•  
   6.4.2 Physical Activity Enjoyment
•  
   6.4.3 Perception of partner
•  
   6.5 Discussion
•  
   6.6 Conclusion
•  
   7 Adaptation and Preference Learning
•  
   7.1 Introduction
•  
   7.2 Related Work on Adaptation and Personalization in HRI
•  
   7.3 Preference Learning Framework
•  
   7.3.1 Dueling Bandits: Problem Statement
•  
   7.3.2 System and Algorithm Implementation
•  
   7.4 Study Design
•  
   7.4.1 Study Procedure
•  
   7.4.2 Participants
•  
   7.4.3 Measurements
•  
  7.5 Results
•  
   7.5.1 Manipulation Check
•  
   7.5.2 Godspeed questionnaire
•  
   7.5.3 System Usability, Intrinsic Motivation and Interaction Quality
•  
   7.5.4 Preference Learning Evaluation
•  
   7.6 Discussion
•  
   7.7 Conclusion
•  
  8 Adaptation and Adaptability
•  
   8.1 Introduction
•  
   8.2 Adaptation, Control and Relationship
•  
   8.2.1 Adaptation: adaptivity vs. adaptability
•  
   8.2.2 Level of Automation
•  
   8.2.3 Relationship and Trust
•  
   8.2.4 Hypotheses
•  
  8.3 System Design
•  
   8.3.1 Exercise Database
•  
   8.3.2 Session Manager
•  
  8.4 Study Design
•  
   8.4.1 Conditions
•  
   8.4.2 Participants
•  
   8.4.3 Procedure
•  
   8.4.4 Measurements
•  
  8.5 Results
•  
   8.5.1 Manipulation Check
•  
   8.6 Discussion
•  
   8.7 Conclusion
•  
  9 Discussion
•  
  9.1 Thesis Summary
•  
   9.1.1 Rational for thesis investigation
•  
   9.1.2 Result Summary
•  
  9.2 Interpretation
•  
   9.2.1 Exercising Motivation
•  
   9.2.2 Subjective perception of the partner
•  
   9.3 Contribution
•  
   9.4 Limitations
•  
   9.5 Future Work
•  
   9.6 Ethical Challenges
•  
   10 Conclusion
•  
  Bibliography
•  
   Own publications
•  
   General
•  
   Acronyms
•  
   Glossary
•  
   Symbols
•  
   Appendices
•  
  A System Overview
•  
   A.1 System Composition
•  
   A.2 Interaction Models
•  
   B Related Work
•  
   C Supplementary Results
•  
  C.1 Self Efficacy Beliefs
•  
   C.1.1 Factors Influencing Exercising Time on Block 1
•  
   C.2 Embodiment
•  
   C.3 Embodiment and Personalization
•  
   D Questionnaires
•  
   D.1 Godspeed Questionnaire
•  
   D.2 Robot Social Attribute Scale
•  
   D.3 Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale
•  
   D.4 System Usability Scale
•  
   D.5 Negative Attitudes Towards Robots Scale
•  
   D.6 Team Perception Scale
•  
   D.7 Cooperation Scale
•  
   D.8 Working Alliance Scale
•  
   D.9 Perceived Information Quality Scale
•  
   D.9.1 Feedback Study
•  
   D.9.2 Preference Learning Studies
•  
   D.10 NEO-FFI
•  
   D.11 Openness To Influence Scale
•  
   D.11.1 Feedback Study
•  
   D.11.2 Preference Learning Studies
•  
   D.12 Intrinsic Motivation
•  
   D.13 Interaction Scale
•  
   Declaration
•  
   Colophon