TY  - JOUR
AB  - Background

The Big Five are seen as stable personality traits. This study hypothesized that their measurement via self-ratings is differentially biased by participants’ emotions. The relationship between habitual emotions and personality should be mirrored in a patterned influence of emotional states upon personality scores.
Methods

We experimentally induced emotional states and compared baseline Big Five scores of ninety-eight German participants (67 female; mean age 22.2) to their scores after the induction of happiness or sadness. Manipulation checks included the induced emotion’s intensity and durability.
Results

The expected differential effect could be detected for neuroticism and extraversion and as a trend for agreeableness. Post-hoc analyses showed that only sadness led to increased neuroticism and decreased extraversion scores. Oppositely, happiness did not decrease neuroticism, but there was a trend for an elevation on extraversion scores.
Conclusion

Results suggest a specific effect of sadness on self-reported personality traits, particularly on neuroticism. Sadness may trigger different self-concepts in susceptible people, biasing perceived personality. This bias could be minimised by tracking participants’ emotional states prior to personality measurement.
DA  - 2014
DO  - 10.1186/2050-7283-2-14
LA  - eng
IS  - 1
PY  - 2014
SN  - 2050-7283
T2  - BMC Psychology
TI  - Sad but true? - How induced emotional states differentially bias self-rated Big Five personality traits
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-26851035
Y2  - 2024-11-22T02:09:08
ER  -