TY  - JOUR
DA  - 2014
KW  - subjects were asked to re-synchronize speech and gesture with a slider. Both studies show that the synchrony of the two modalities is far less significant in perception than was assumed a priori through the observation of production. In fact
KW  - 1985
KW  - Kendon
KW  - 2004
KW  - 1980). We conducted two studies on the perceptual integration of desynchronized speech and gesture in listeners. In the first study
KW  - people rated how natural asynchronies in multimodal stimuli felt to them
KW  - both with speech before and after the gesture up to 600ms. In the second study
KW  - 2005
KW  - McNeill
KW  - 2007
KW  - robots
KW  - etc. Strikingly in contrast to other areas of psycholinguistics
KW  - the focus in gesture research has mainly been on production rather than perception (e.g. Feyereisen
KW  - since the production synchrony is programmed into virtual agents
KW  - Schegloff
KW  - 1984). Presumably
KW  - the bimodal synchrony is deemed highly relevant for perception
KW  - 1998
KW  - de Ruiter & Wilkins
KW  - 2000
KW  - Krauss
KW  - de Ruiter
KW  - 2011
KW  - 1980
KW  - 2005) and numerous studies have engaged in analyzing the significance of synchronized production for meaning creation: There is a semantic connection between the two modalities (e.g. Kirchhof
KW  - audiovisual integration
KW  - speech-gesture synchrony
KW  - speech may precede or follow gesture by ±500 ms or more and one might not even notice. It follows that speech-gesture synchrony is merely a production phenomenon.

Key words: perception
KW  - Abstract

Spontaneous gestures and concurrent speech are produced approximately simultaneously (e.g.Kendon
LA  - eng
PY  - 2014
TI  - Desynchronized speech-gesture signals still get the message across
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-27038047
Y2  - 2024-11-24T03:13:17
ER  -