TY  - GEN
AB  - In Farrell and Maskin (1989), the authors present sufficient conditions for weakly
renegotiation-proof payoffs in their Theorem 1 (p. 332). We show that a step in the
proof of this theorem is not correct by giving a counterexample. Nevertheless, the
sufficient conditions remain true, and we offer a correction of the proof.
DA  - 2017
KW  - (Weak) Renegotiation-Proofness
KW  - Infinitely Repeated Games
LA  - eng
PY  - 2017
SN  - 0931-6558
SP  - 33-
TI  - A Note on "Renegotiation in Repeated Games" [Games Econ. Behav. 1 (1989) 327–360]
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-29102741
Y2  - 2024-11-22T14:10:45
ER  -