TY  - JOUR
AB  - A limited but accumulating body of research and theoretical commentary offers support for core claims of the “institutional-anomie theory” of crime (IAT) and points to areas needing further development. In this paper, which focuses on violent crime, we clarify the concept of social institutions, elaborate the cultural component of IAT, derive implications for individual behavior, summarize empirical applications, and propose directions for future research. Drawing on Talcott Parsons, we distinguish the “subjective” and “objective” dimensions of institutional dynamics and discuss their interrelationship. We elaborate on the theory’s cultural component with reference to Durkheim’s distinction between “moral” and “egoistic” individualism and propose that a version of the egoistic type characterizes societies in which the economy dominates the institutional structure, anomie is rampant, and levels of violent crime are high. We also offer a heuristic model of IAT that integrates macro- and individual levels of analysis. Finally, we discuss briefly issues for the further theoretical elaboration of this macro-social perspective on violent crime. Specifically, we call attention to the important tasks of explaining the emergence of economic dominance in the institutional balance of power and of formulating an institutional account for distinctive punishment practices, such as the advent of mass incarceration in the United States.
DA  - 2008-11-02
DO  - 10.4119/ijcv-2763
LA  - eng
IS  - 2
M2  - 163
PY  - 2008-11-02
SN  - 1864-1385
SP  - 163-181
T2  - International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV)
TI  - Institutions, Anomie, and Violent Crime: Clarifying and Elaborating Institutional-Anomie Theory
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2763
Y2  - 2024-11-22T17:33:22
ER  -