BACKGROUND: The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL, now PCL-5) has recently been revised to reflect the new diagnostic criteria of the disorder. METHODS: A clinical sample of trauma-exposed individuals (N = 352) was assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and the PCL-5. Internal consistencies and test-retest reliability were computed. To investigate diagnostic accuracy, we calculated receiver operating curves. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed to analyze the structural validity. RESULTS: Results showed high internal consistency (α = .95), high test-retest reliability (r = .91) and a high correlation with the total severity score of the CAPS-5, r = .77. In addition, the recommended cutoff of 33 on the PCL-5 showed high diagnostic accuracy when compared to the diagnosis established by the CAPS-5. CFAs comparing the DSM-5 model with alternative models (the three-factor solution, the dysphoria, anhedonia, externalizing behavior and hybrid model) to account for the structural validity of the PCL-5 remained inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings show that the German PCL-5 is a reliable instrument with good diagnostic accuracy. However, more research evaluating the underlying factor structure is needed.
Titelaufnahme
Titelaufnahme
- TitelThe German version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): psychometric properties and diagnostic utility
- Verfasser
- Erschienen
- AnmerkungBMC Psychiatry 17 (2017) 379, 1-9Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2017 der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster).
- SpracheEnglisch
- DokumenttypAufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
- Schlagwörter (EN)
- URN
- DOI
Zugriffsbeschränkung
- Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar
Links
- Social MediaShare
- Nachweis
- IIIF
Dateien
Klassifikation
Abstract
Inhalt
Statistik
- Das PDF-Dokument wurde 5 mal heruntergeladen.
Lizenz-/Rechtehinweis