TY  - JOUR
AB  - This paper targets the observation that border control has become increasingly diversified not least since what is commonly referred to as the ‘refugee crisis’. This development, however, prompts the question to what degree conventional normative justifications or legitimization strategies of border control can still acknowledge these diversified practices. Alongside, the discussion allows evoking the more general question at what point a normative argument must take into account diverging practices. This paper will be structured in two parts: The first part investigates the deviations in border control, thereby structuring these along the lines of externalization, internalization, and privatization; the second part examines whether commonly used normative arguments for the justification or legitimation of border regimes can still be upheld in the face of deviating border control practices. The discussion ultimately allows a reflection upon the relation between theoretical reflection and changing practice in the context of border control.
AU  - Risse, Verena
DA  - 2019
DO  - 10.17879/95189433777
KW  - Migration
KW  - Grenzen
KW  - Grenzkontrolle
KW  - Rechtfertigung
KW  - migration
KW  - borders
KW  - border control
KW  - justification
LA  - eng
IS  - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”
M2  - 10
N1  - Matthias Hoesch/Lena Laube (eds.): Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”, 101-117. DOI: 10.17879/85189704253
PY  - 2019
SP  - 10-
T2  - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”
TI  - (Recent) Deviations in Border Control – Challenges for Normative Strategies of Justification?
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189434715
Y2  - 2024-12-25T20:28:33
ER  -