TY  - JOUR
AB  - In this paper I clarify and scrutinize some of the implications of a state-centric bias in political philosophy. Based on Serena Parekh’s analysis of “the ethics of admission” (2014, 2017), the main example of this bias I will present is how political philosophers have addressed the question of what justice requires of states in relation to refugees. I begin by clarifying the central features of the state-centric bias in political philosophy and how it is given concrete expression in the ethics of migration as an emphasis on obligations of hosting states to admit immigrants. Further, I present one central implications of the ethics of admission that seem morally unacceptable: the cherry-picking of problems. This is a shortened version of a paper in progress.
AU  - Servan, Johannes
DA  - 2019
DO  - 10.17879/95189431960
KW  - Staatszentriertheit
KW  - Migrationsethik
KW  - Flüchtlinge
KW  - Weltbürgerrecht
KW  - state-centric bias
KW  - ethics of migration
KW  - refugees
KW  - cosmopolitan law
LA  - eng
IS  - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”
M2  - 8
N1  - Matthias Hoesch/Lena Laube (eds.): Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”, 125-137. DOI: 10.17879/85189704253
PY  - 2019
SP  - 8-
T2  - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”
TI  - ‘What Justice Requires’ – a State-Centric Bias in the Ethics of Migration
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189432369
Y2  - 2024-12-26T20:22:02
ER  -