TY  - JOUR
AB  - Introduction: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. Methods: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. Results: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. Conclusions: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.
AU  - Reicheneder, Claudia
AU  - Hofrichter, Bernd
AU  - Faltermeier, Andreas
AU  - Proff, Peter
AU  - Proff, Peter Christian
AU  - Lippold, Carsten
AU  - Lippold, Carsten Wilhelm
AU  - Kirschneck, Christian Johannes
DA  - 2014-11-28
DO  - doi:10.1186/1746-160X-10-51
KW  - Retainer
KW  - Wire
KW  - Adhesive
KW  - Sandblasting
KW  - Shear bond strength
LA  - eng
N1  - BMC Head & Face Medicine 10 (2014) 51, 1-6
N1  - Finanziert durch den Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2014/2015 der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU Münster).
PY  - 2014-11-28
SN  - 1746-160X
TI  - Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-90389477603
Y2  - 2024-11-22T05:23:36
ER  -