TY  - JOUR
AB  - This paper comments on a talk given by Lukasz Dziedzic at the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”, September 2018, in Bielefeld. Dziedzic addresses an important question: When states form a scheme of fair distribution of refugees, do they have to take into account the interests and preferences of the refugees? Or is getting protection from somewhere the only moral claim that refugees have? Although I don’t disagree with Dziedzic’s conclusions and proposals, I doubt that some of his arguments are useful to justify his conclusions. Furthermore, I claim that the focus on the European Union puts him (and others) at risk of fallacies. Dziedzic’s paper is available under doi: 10.17879/95189437167.
AU  - Hoesch, Matthias
DA  - 2019
DO  - 10.17879/95189436504
KW  - Exzellenzcluster Religion und Politik
KW  - Asyl
KW  - Flüchtlinge
KW  - Verantwortungsteilung
KW  - Cluster of Excellence Religion and Politics
KW  - asylum
KW  - refugees
KW  - responsibility sharing
LA  - eng
IS  - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”
M2  - 11
N1  - Matthias Hoesch/Lena Laube (eds.): Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”, 95-99. DOI: 10.17879/85189704253
PY  - 2019
SP  - 11-
T2  - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis”
TI  - Comment on Lukasz Dziedzic: What Is Owed to Refugees when Attributing Responsibilities to States in Institutionalized Responsibility Sharing Regimes?
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-95189436828
Y2  - 2024-12-26T07:40:54
ER  -