In this paper I clarify and scrutinize some of the implications of a state-centric bias in political philosophy. Based on Serena Parekh’s analysis of “the ethics of admission” (2014, 2017), the main example of this bias I will present is how political philosophers have addressed the question of what justice requires of states in relation to refugees. I begin by clarifying the central features of the state-centric bias in political philosophy and how it is given concrete expression in the ethics of migration as an emphasis on obligations of hosting states to admit immigrants. Further, I present one central implications of the ethics of admission that seem morally unacceptable: the cherry-picking of problems. This is a shortened version of a paper in progress.
Titelaufnahme
Titelaufnahme
Zugriffsbeschränkung
Links
Dateien
Klassifikation
Abstract
Statistik
